Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2140 of 2025 1 - Kanha Ram Yadav S/o Chhablu Ram Yadav Aged About 45 Years R/o Ward No. 50 Borsi Bhata, District Durg (C.G.) 2 - Budhu Yadav S/o Munshiram Yadav Aged About 64 Years R/o Ward No.
50
Borsi
Bhata,
District
Durg
(C.G.) 3 - Sat Kumar Yadav S/o Chhabiram Yadav Aged About 45 Years R/o Ward
No.
50
Borsi
Bhata,
District
Durg
(C.G.) 4 - Nand Kumar Yadav S/o Dasru Yadav Aged About 44 Years R/o Ward No.
50
Borsi
Bhata,
District
Durg
(C.G.) 5 - Dashrath Yadav S/o Puna Ram Yadav Aged About 80 Years R/o Ward
No.
50
Borsi
Bhata,
District
Durg
(C.G.) 6 - Balwant Yadav S/o Rikhiram Aged About 76 Years R/o Ward No. 50 Borsi Bhata, District Durg (C.G.)
... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - The State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Urban Administration And Development, Mahanadi Bhavan, Naya Raipur, District
Raipur
Chhattisgarh
492002 2 - The Livestock Development Department Through Its Secretary Indrawati Bhavan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 492002 3
- The
Collector,
District
Durg,
Chhattisgarh 4 - The Superintendent Of Police, District Durg, Chhattisgarh 5 - The Municipal Corporation Durg, Through The Commissioner, Municipal Corporation Durg, District Durg, Chhattisgarh. 6 - Market Officer, Municipal Corporation Durg, District Durg, Chhattisgarh VISHAKHA BEOHAR Digitally signed by VISHAKHA BEOHAR Date: 2025.04.30 17:44:01 +0530
2
... Respondents (Cause-title taken from the Case Information System) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Petitioner :- Mr. Shalvik Tiwari, Advocate For State :- Mr. Khulesh Sahu, P.L. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ SB- Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order On Board 28.04.2025
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the outset, submits that he may be allowed to withdraw the petition with liberty to file individual petitions against the individual notices of removal of concerned dairy of the petitioners.
2. The prayer is fair and reasonable.
3. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty reserved in favour of the petitioners.
4. Copy of the original documents filed by the petitioners be returned back to them after retaining photocopies of the same. sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Vishakha