ARCHANA SRIVASTAVA v. DIRECTOR BASIC EDU. NISHATGANJ LUCKNOW AND OTHERS
WRIA/15943/2017 · 2025-11-21
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 199095 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 199095 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 15943 of 2017 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the State is present.
4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Consigned to records. November 21, 2025 Muk Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rakesh Pathak, Dinesh Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Manish Mishra (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Archana Srivastava .....Petitioner(s) Director Basic Edu. Nishatganj Lucknow And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MOHD UMAR KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench