KRISHNABIHARI TRIPATHI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. SECONDARY EDU. LKO AND 3 OTHERS
WRIA/15179/2025 · 2025-12-19
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 199088 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 199088 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 15179 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Rajiv Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the State-respondents. Notice to respondent no. 4 is hereby dispensed with. Instant petition has been filed with the following prayers:-
"I- Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus, commanding the opposite party no. 2 to fix the salary of the petitioner in tune of Rs. 52,000 on 31-12- 2019 that is the date of retirement (last pay drawn) of the petitioner and revise the pension of the petitioner on the basis of salary last pay drawn. II- Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus, commanding the opposite party no. 2, to revise all post-retirement dues on the basis of the salary last pay drawn and other service benefits equal to the similarly situated person namely Anant Ram Mishra with 12% interest of per annum to the petitioner. III- Any other writ, order or direction which this Hon'ble Court deems fit, just and proper in the circumstances of the case. " It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that some recommendation has been made vide annexure nos. 11 & 12 to the Director Education, Secondary, Lucknow, and the decision has not been taken as yet. After argument at length, he submitted that interest of justice would be sub- served if this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to direct the Director Education, Secondary, Lucknow, to take decision on the said recommendation. Be that as it may, without entering into the merit of the case, the petitioner is Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ramesh Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Krishnabihari Tripathi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Secondary Edu. Lko And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
permitted to move a fresh representation within period of 10 days, and if such representation is moved within aforesaid period, the respondent no. 2/ Director Education, Secondary, Lucknow, is hereby directed to consider and decide the same, within further period of six weeks, in accordance with law, from the date, a certified copy of this order is produced before him. With the aforesaid observations, the instant petition is disposed of.
December 19, 2025 Mayank WRIA No. 15179 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench