JAY SINGH CHAURASIYA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. (HOME) U.P. LKO.
BAIL/7843/2025 · 2025-10-10
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 199085 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 199085 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 7843 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record.
2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.163 of 2025, under Sections 103(1), 238 (a), 61(2)A, BNS, P.S. Inayat Nagar, District Ayodhya.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that the co-accused Neetu @ Rangoli having similar allegation has been enlarged on bail vide order dated 18.7.2025 passed in Criminal Misc Bail Application No. 6457 of
2025. He further argues that the materials based upon which the applicant was implicated is similar to the co accused.
4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances and adopting the same reasoning, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in jail since 30.12.2024 having no criminal history is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed.
6. Let the applicant Jay Singh Chaurasiya be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Dhiraj Chaurasiya, Gajendra Yadav, Keshav Ram Chaurasia Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Jay Singh Chaurasiya .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. (Home) U.P. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 10, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 7843 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench