2025:JHHC:27029 1 W.P.(C) No. 5812 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 5813 of 2017 Abhijeet Ghosh, son of Arun Ghosh, Proprietor of M/s Abhijeet Sweets, A.G. Colony, Kadru, P.O. Doranda, P.S. Argora, District- Ranchi ….........Petitioner(s) Vrs. 1.The State of Jharkhand through the Secretary, Food & Safety Department cum Adjudicating Officer, Government of Jharkhand, Project Building, at Dhurwa, P.O. Dhurwa, P.s. Dhurwa, District- Ranchi 2.Deputy Commissioner, Ranchi cum Adjudicating Officer, Food & Safety Department, Ranchi, P.O., G.P.O, P.s. Kotwali, District Ranchi 3.Shri Sanjay Kumar, son of father’s name not known, being the complainant as a Food Safety Officer, C/o Civil Surgeon’s Office, at Sadar Hospital Campus, Main Road, P.O. G.P.O, P.S. Kotwali, District- Ranchi .......... Respondent(s) ….... CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR For the Petitioner : Mr. Rohit Ranjan Sinha, Advocate For the Resp. No.3 : Mr. Deepak Kumar Prasad, Advocate For the Resp.-State : Mr. Sushant Kumar, A.C to S.C.-II 11/08.09.2025 The writ petition has been filed for the following relief(s) “For issuance of an appropriate writ(s)/order(s) and / or direction (s) for quashing the order dated 30.06.2017 (Annexure-3) passed by the Deputy Commissioner cum Adjudicating Officer, Ranchi, by which accused namely Shri Abhijeet Ghosh, son of Shri Arun Ghosh, Prop. Of M/s Abhijeet Sweet, A.G. Colony, Ranchi, from whom the sample of kalakand purchased from the accused Abhijeet Ghosh is adulterated by virtue of presence of added starch as an extraneous matter, hence the accused committed an offence punishable under Section 50 and 54 of the Food Safety & Standards Act, 2006.” 2. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that there is alternative and efficacious remedy available under the said Act and now the Tribunal is functional and as such, he seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition. 3. Learned counsel for the other side has no objection to the prayer. 2025:JHHC:27029 2 W.P.(C) No. 5812 of 2017 4. In that view of the matter, the writ petition stands disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to approach the Tribunal. 5. If the petitioner approaches the Tribunal, the learned Tribunal will proceed with the matter in accordance with law. (Rajesh Kumar, J.) A.Mohanty