IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No. 1731 of 2025 Date of Decision: 09.09.2025 _______________________________________________________ Suresh Kumar …….Petitioner Versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation & anr. … Respondents ______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Sat Prakash, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Ram Jamalta, Advocate. _______________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral): By way of instant Execution Petition, prayer has been made on behalf of the petitioner for issuance of directions to the respondents to implement/ execute the order/judgment dated 21.05.2025 passed by this Court in CWP No. 8277 of 2025, titled Suresh Kumar vs. Himachal Road Transport Corporation and another. 2. Careful perusal of aforesaid order/judgment, sought to be executed in the instant proceedings, reveals that this Court, while disposing of the petition, directed the respondents to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner in light of judgment dated 17.7.2014 passed in CWP No. 3050 of 2024, tilted Nek Ram vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and others , within a period of six weeks. Since, despite there being specific direction to do the needful, 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 as taken note hereinabove, respondents have failed to do so, petitioner has approached this Court in the instant proceedings. 3. Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate, while accepting notice on behalf of the respondents, states that though he has every reason to believe and presume that by now aforesaid judgment/ order must have been complied with, but if not, same would be complied with within a period of two weeks from today. 4. Consequently, in view of the fair statement made by learned counsel for the respondents, this Court sees no reason to keep the present petition alive and as such, same is accordingly disposed of with the direction to the respondents to do the needful in terms of order/judgment dated 21.05.2025 passed by this Court, positively within a period of two weeks, if not already done, failing which, petitioner would be at liberty to get the present proceedings revived, so that appropriate action, in accordance with law, is taken towards implementation of the judgment/ order, sought to be executed in the instant proceedings. (Sandeep Sharma), Judge September 09,2025 (shankar)