Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 199077 (ALL)

RAJESH KUMAR SINGH AND 8 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. TECHNICAL EDUCATION LKO. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIA/15222/2025 · 2025-12-19

Shree Prakash Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 15222 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Pradeep Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the State, Mr. R.B.S. Rathaur, learned counsel for the respondent nos.3, 4 & 5 and perused the material on record. Instant petition has been filed seeking following reliefs:- "I. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus to direct the respondents no 2-5 to, pay the salary for Month January 2024 to July 2025 (19 Months), to give form 16 for financial Year 2024-25, and to add increment in petitioners current salary as well as to the salary (from January 2024 to July 2025). II. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents no 2-5 to decide the representation made by the petitioner, dated 3.12.25 as contained in annexure no 11 to this petition." Learned counsel for the petitioner, after argument at length, submits that the interest of justice would be sub-served if this Hon'ble Court is pleased to give liberty to the petitioner to move fresh representation before the respondent no.4 within fifteen days and direct the respondent no.4 to consider and decide the same in accordance with law, within stipulated period of time as may be fixed by this Court. Learned counsels for the respondents have no objection to the submission aforesaid. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dhirendra Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., R.B.S. Rathaur Rajesh Kumar Singh And 8 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Technical Education Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Be that as it may, without entering into merits of the case, the petitioner is given liberty to move fresh representation before the respondent no.4/Director, Feroze Gandhi Institute of Engineering and Technology, Raebareli within fifteen days and in case such representation is moved, the respondent no.4 is directed to consider and decide the same in accordance with law, within further period of six weeks. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is disposed of. December 19, 2025 Ram Murti WRIA No. 15222 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAM MURTI YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench