KALAM AJAD v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME LKO AND ANOTHER
ABAIL/1179/2025 · 2025-11-21
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 199072 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 199072 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 1179 of 2025
Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Supplementary affidavit filed today in Court is taken on record.
2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant; learned AGA for the State and perused the records.
3. The present application has been filed seeking anticipatory bail apprehending arrest in FIR No.97 of 2002, under Section 417, 418, 419, 420, 467, 468 IPC, Police Station Kotwali Nagar, District Sultanpur.
4. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that in terms of the FIR, allegations were levelled with regard to the execution of the sale deed. The applicant is marginal witness. It is argued that charge-sheet was filed in the year 2002 and now the applicant has been summoned.
5. Learned AGA opposes the bail application.
6. Considering the time undergone, a case for anticipatory bail is made out. The present application for anticipatory bail is accordingly allowed.
7. In the event of arrest, let the applicant Kalam Ajad be released on anticipatory bail in aforesaid FIR number till conclusion of trial on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.30,000/- each to the satisfaction of Court below concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Anu Pratap Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Kalam Ajad .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
(b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. (d) The applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court. November 21, 2025 nishant ABAIL No. 1179 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- NISHANT MOHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench