Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19907 (KAR)

JANAKRAM KOTA v. SRI. JATINDER ANGARIA

CRL.A/655/2023 · 2025-02-12

Shivashankar Amarannavar

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:6186 CRL.A No. 655 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 655 OF 2023 BETWEEN: JANAKRAM KOTA S/O LATE K.V. SUBBARAO AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.204, 4TH CROSS C.M.R ROAD, KALYAN NAGAR H.R.B.R LAYOUT, 3RD BLOCK BENGALURU-560 043 …APPELLANT (BY SMT. PREMALATHA C, ADVOCATE - [ABSENT]) AND: SRI. JATINDER ANGARIA S/O JARNAIL SINGH AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.77/1, 2ND FLOOR RAMACHANDRA ROAD KAMMANAHALLI BENGALURU-560 084 …RESPONDENT THIS CRL.A IS FILED U/S 378(4) OF CR.P.C. PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT ORDER DATED 29.10.2022 IN C.C.NO.55155/2019 ON THE FILE OF XIV A.C.M.M MAYO HALL UNIT, BENGALURU. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: Digitally signed by HEMAVATHY GANGABYRAPPA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:6186 CRL.A No. 655 of 2023 CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the appellant is absent. There is no representation on the appellant’s side. The appeal is listed today for compliance of office objections for the fifth time. Inspite of giving sufficient opportunities, the office objections are not complied. It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non compliance of office objections. Sd/- (SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR) JUDGE GH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 14