DINESH @ MANOHAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO.
NA528/1763/2025 · 2025-11-14
Tej Pratap Tiwari
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 199056 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 199056 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 1763 of 2025 Court No. - 34 HON'BLE TEJ PRATAP TIWARI, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, the learned AGA for the State and perused the record. 2. By means of the instant application, the applicant has prayed that this Court be pleased to direct the learned court below not to insist the applicant to file separate surety bonds in each and every four cases and accept only two sureties in lieu of all above mentioned four cases, in the interest of justice. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the applicant submits that it has become impossible for the applicant to submit surety in each of case in which he has been granted bail. He added that the applicant has been granted bail in all ten cases arising out of following Case Crime Numbers :- (i) Case Crime no. 357/2025 U/s 307, 115 (2), 118 (1) 317 (2) B.N.S.(old Section 382, 323, 324, 411 IPC) Police Station - Kakori, District Lucknow, released on bail on 30.10.2025 Bail application no. 8643/2025 granted by Session Judge, Lucknow. Amount of Surety : Rs. 30,000/- x 2 + Personal Bond. (ii) Case Crime no. 107/2025 U/s 305-A, 331 (4), 317 (2) B.N.S. (old Section 457/380/411 IPC) Police Station Mahigavan, District Lucknow released on bail on 18.10.2025 Bail application no, 8406/2025 granted by Session Judge, Lucknow. Amount of Surety: Rs. 25,000/- x 2 + Personal Bond. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Pawan Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Dinesh @ Manohar .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
(iii) Case Crime no. 202/2025 U/s 305-A, 331 (4), 317 (2) B.N.S. (old Section 457/380/411 IPC) Police Station Mall, District Lucknow, released on bail on 29.10.2025 Bail application no. 8469/2025 granted by Addl. Session Judge, Court no. 4/Special Judge E.C. Act Lucknow. Amount of Surety: Rs. 50,000/- x 2 + Personal Bond. (iv) Case Crime no. 356/2025 U/s 305-A, 331 (4), 317 (2) B.N.S. (old Section 457/380/411 IPC) Police Station Kakori, District Lucknow , released on bail on Bail application, no. 8353/2025 granted by Addl. Session Judge Court no. 5 /Special Judge Gangster Act, Lucknow. Amount of Surety : Rs. 4.
He next added that despite the Trial Court granted the bail, the applicant is still in jail and the applicant being poor person is unable to produce the sureties in each cases. It is further submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that in similar circumstances, namely, in the case of Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh [SLP (Crl.) No.8914-8915/2018] the Supreme Court vide order dated 29.10.2018 has permitted the petitioner to submit personal bonds and two sureties of heavy amount to hold good in all the cases. 5. Considering the aforesaid fact, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the applicant to furnish a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- and two sureties of the like amount in one case, which shall be treated to be valid in all other cases wherein the bail orders have been passed. November 14, 2025 Manoj NA528 No. 1763 of 2025 2 (Tej Pratap Tiwari,J.) Digitally signed by :- MANOJ KUMAR YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench