Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 199051 (ALL)

AYUSH AGGARWAL AND OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME CIVIL SECRETT. LKO. AND ANOTHER

A482/6610/2023 · 2025-11-21

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 6610 of 2023 Court No. - 16 HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J. 1. None is present for the applicants. Sri Harish Chandra, learned counsel for opposite party no.2 as well as learned A.G.A. for the State are present. 2. Heard and perused the record. 3. The instant application has been filed for quashing of the impugned complaint case no. 1554 of 2019 (Smt. Richa gupta Vs. Ayush Aggarwal and others), annexed as annexure No.1 and impugned summoning order dated- 06.12.2021 annexed as annexure No.2 passed in impugned complaint case no.1554 of 2019 (Smt. Richa Gupta Vs. Ayush Agrawal and others), impugned order passed by learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, District-Lucknow U/s- 323, 498 A of IPC, 3/4 D.P. Act, Police Station-Chinhat, District-Lucknow. 4. This court had passed order dated 10.10.2023 for mediation, but as per office report dated 16.10.2025, the amount has not been deposited before the Mediation Center. There is also not any report from the Mediation Center, however, learned counsel for the opposite party No. 2 Sri Harish Chandra, Advocate, has submitted that compromise has taken place between the parties on 12.09.2025. Copy of the aforesaid compromise has been brought on record alongwith the supplementary affidavit dated 23.09.2025, as ANNEXURE NO. SA-1. 5. Whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the trial court concerned as such compromise has to be duly verified in presence of the parties concerned before the Court. 6. Accordingly, this application is disposed of with a direction to the parties concerned to appear before the trial court concerned within 2 weeks from today alongwith original compromise and the trial court is Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Amit Srivastava, Krishna Kumar Dewide, Rajesh Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Harish Chandra Ayush Aggarwal And Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Secrett. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) directed to verify the compromise within next 6 weeks. If the aforesaid compromise is verified, a report to that effect shall be prepared by the court and the compromise will be made part of the record. 7. The court concerned in that scenario will allow the parties to obtain certified copy of the report as well as compromise and it will be open to the applicants to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings. 8. For a period of three month, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants in the aforesaid case. 9. Office is directed to return the original compromise deed, if it is on record, to the learned counsel for the applicants, after taking the photocopy of the same. November 21, 2025 A.Nigam A482 No. 6610 of 2023 2 (Brij Raj Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench