APHC010278682025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADES. AT AMARAVATI •X rAr o WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JUF^, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE ^ PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO I.A. NOS. 1 AND 3 OF 2025 SlH ^ IN & AND CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 638 OF 2025 lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Between; Tammana (Vankayala) Venkata Mahalakshmi, W/o. Venkata Nagesh, age about 45 years, Occ. employee, R/o Back side of Sriram Pasarlavari Street, Royapet, Nidadavole, East Godavari District. ...Petitioner/Appellant/Accused Public School, AND 1. Rudru Veera Venkata Subba Rao, S/o. Satyanarayana years, Occ. Cultivation, R/o Manchili, District. age about 49 Attili Mandal, West Godavari ...Respondent/Complainant 2. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, of A.P., Amaravathi. High Court ...Respondent/State Petition under Section 5 of Limitation Act praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of 88 days in filing the Revision against the judgment dated 12-11-2024 passed in CrlANo.72 of 2024, on the file of on the file of the IV Additional District & Sessions Judge, Tanuku. lA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 438 (1) of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to enlarged the petitioner on bail by suspending the judgment dated 12-11-2024 passed in Crl.A.No.72 of 2024, on the file of on the file of the IV Additional District & Sessions Judge, Tanuku, which arise out of conviction and sentence dated 25-03-2024, passed in CC.No.807 of 2020, on the file of the Special Magistrate Court, Tanuku, pending disposal of CrI.R.C., lA NO: 3 OF 2025 Petition under Section 359 (2) BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to record the compromise by allowing the Criminal Revision by setting aside the judgment dated 12-11-2024 passed in Crl.A.No.72 of 2024, on the file of on the file of the IV Additional District & Sessions Judge, Tanuku as well as the conviction and sentence dated 25-03-2024, passed in CC.No.807 of 2020, on the file of the Special Magistrate Court, Tanuku and consequently acquit the 1®* Respondent/Petitioner/Accused herein as the matter is settled out of court in between the parties. CrI. R.C. No. 638 of 2Q2fi Revision filed under Section 438 & 442 of BNSS aggrieved by the judgment dated 12-11-2024, made in Crl.A.No.72 of 2024, on the file of the IV Additional District & Sessions Judge, Tanuku, confirming the conviction and sentence dated 25-03-2024, passed in CC.No.807 of 2020, by the Special Magistrate Court, Tanuku. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI K V L NARASIMHA RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI MUNAKALA VENKATA RAMANA Counsel for the Respondent No.2: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following ORDER: APHC010278682025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y.- LAKSHMANA RAO I.A.Nos.l and 3 of 2025 In&And CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 638/2025 Between: Tammana (Vankayala) Venkata Mahalakshmi, ...PETITIONER AND Rudm Veera Venkata Subba Rao and others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: K.V. L.Narasimha Rao Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. Munakala Venkata Ramana 2. Public Prosecutor The Court made the following: ORDER: The petitioner/accused and the 1®* respondent/complainant are present. I.A.No.1 of 2025 2. This application is filed seeking to condone the day of 88 days in filing the revision. 2 Dr.YLR, f Crl.R.C.No.638of 2025 Dated 25.06.2025 3. In the affidavit referred that the petitioner and the 1 compromised the matter at the instance of the elders of both families. For the reasons in the accompanying affidavit, the petition in delay of 88 days in preferring the revision is condoned. I.A.No.a of 2025 St respondent have 4. This application is filed to record the compromise effected between the petitioner and the d"' respondent. In the affidavit, it is mentioned that the petitioner, being the accused, intends to pay an amount of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh Only) by drawing a demand draft (DD) in favour of the 1®* respondent towards full and final settlement of the claim of the complaint. 5. A joint memo is filed with the signatures of the petitioner and the respondent, along with their respective counsels, effecting a compromise and the petitioner paying Rs. 1,00,000/-. 6. In view of the compromise arrived at in between the petitioner and the I,' 1 respondent, the revision case is disposed of as compromised by settlement out of Court,permitting the 1®‘ respondent to compound the offence Section 320 (6) of ‘the Cr.P.C’. St 1 under 7. Accordingly, the I.A.Nos.1 and 3 of 2025 are allowed, and the Criminal Revision Case is disposed of as compromised by compounding the offence. Consequently, the conviction and sentence passed by the learned Special Magistrate, Tanuku in C.C.No.807 of 2020, dated 25.03.2024 Criminal Appeal No.72 of 2024, dated 12.11.2024 as confirmed in by the learned IV 1/ O) 3 Dr.YLRJ Crl.R.C.No.638of 2025 Dated 25.06.2025 Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tanuku, are set aside, as a result, the petitioner is acquitted. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand ¥ 8. closed. Sd/- V DIWAKAR DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, The IV Additional District & Sessions Judge, Tanuku. The Special Magistrate Court, Tanuku. One CC to Sri. K V L Narasimha Rao, Advocate [OPUC] One CC to Sri. Munakala Venkata Ramana, Advocate [OPUC] Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati. [OUT] Two CD Copies 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Chp sree HIGH COURT DATED:25/06/2025 ORDER I.A. NOS. 1 & 3 of 2025 IN & AND CRLRC NO. 638 OF 2025 t I JUL 2025 ^Js»QjjfrentSectio|ix’^/ ALLOWING THE I.A. NOS. 1 & 3 of 2025 AND DISPOSING OF THE CRIMINAL REVISION CASE