HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 3879 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J. 1. None appears on behalf of the petitioner, even in the revised call. 2. Shri Prakhar Mishra, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State respondent(s) and Shri Mohan Singh, learned counsel for Goan Sabha are present. 3. In light of the fact that learned counsel for the petitioner has not appeared in the revised call, we are of the view that the petitioner is no longer interested in pursuing this writ petition. 4. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed for default. 5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. October 8, 2025 Raj Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Priyanka Yadav, Pradeep Kumar Maurya, Rizwanul Haque Ansari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Ram Milan .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench