Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 1990 (AP)

KOTAPATI PRABHAKAR v. G. SAI PRASAD, IAS

CC/3995/2025 · 2026-06-14

V Sujatha

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010669772025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] MONDAY,THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3995/2025 Between: 1. KOTAPATI PRABHAKAR, S/O MALYADRI, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCC CIVIL CONTRACTOR R/O D.NO. 7-19-160/76/2, VASANTHARAYAPURAM, GUNTUR. ...PETITIONER AND 1. G SAI PRASAD IAS, S/O NOT KNOWN TO THIS PETITIONER. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. PEEYUSH KUMAR IAS, S/O NOT KNOWN TO THIS PETITIONER. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. S SUDHAKAR, S/O NOT KNOWN TO THIS PETITIONER, THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, K. W DIVISION, TENALI, WARP ROAD, TENALI, ANDHRA PRADESH, 522201 4. ZAKIR AHMED, S/O NOT KNOWN TO THIS PETITIONER. THE DEPUTY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, WESTERN SUB DIVISION, BAPATLA. ...CONTEMNOR(S): 2 Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the Respondents herein under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, for wilful disobedience of order of this Honhle Court dated. 04-09-2025 passed in W.P.No. 22291 of 2025, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SASANKA BHUVANAGIRI Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. SOMA RAJU YELISETTI The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: This Contempt Case is filed under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for willful, wanton and deliberate disobedience in implementation of the order passed by this Court on 04.09.2025 in W.P.No.22291 of 2025. 2. Today when the matter came up for hearing, Sri. Y. Alex Babu, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the order dated 04.09.2025 has been complied with by the respondent authorities and requested to close the contempt case. 3. In view of the fact that the orders passed by this Court on 04.09.2025 were complied with by the respondents, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA Date: 15.06.2026 Gss