HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6763 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. Learned counsel for petitioner has filed an application for implead to implead Chairman, Board of Revenue as opposite party, which is taken on record. 3. Further, in view of the facts stated in the affidavit filed in support of application, the impleadment, the application is allowed. 4. Let necessary impleadment be made during course of the day. 5. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondents are hereby dispensed with. 6. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the Board of Revenue Uttar Pradesh to decide Revision bearing No. REV / 522 /2024/Gonda Computerized Case No. R2024083000522 (madhuri Vs. Mahesh Kumar and others), expeditiously. 7. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petition would be sufficiently met in case Chairman, Board of Revenue, U.P. Lucknow considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner. 8. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ambrish Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pankaj Gupta Shiv Kumar Pandey And Another .....Petitioner(s) Madhuri And Others .....Respondent(s) 9. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent No. 5 - Chairman, Board of Revenue, U.P. Lucknow is directed to decide Revision bearing No. REV / 522 /2024/Gonda Computerized Case No. R2024083000522 (madhuri Vs. Mahesh Kumar and others), expeditiously, say within a period of one year from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 10. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. 11. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. November 21, 2025 Ravi/ A227 No. 6763 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench