HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 7900 of 2024 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Neerav Chitravanshi, learned counsel for Power Corporation Ltd/ respondents. 2. The present writ petition has been filed with the following main relief:- "(I) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari to quash the impugned Office Memorandum dated 25.01.2014 issued by the opposite party no.2 by which excludes the reimbursement of expenses incurred by an employee in a nursing home and also quash the impugned order dated 18.06.2024 passed by the opposite party no.2, by which the claim of the medical reimbursement of the husband of the petitioner has been rejected, contained as Annexure No.2 & 3 to this writ petition. (II) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the opposite parties to reimburse the amount of Rs. 6,65,593/- along with admissible interest, from the date of rejection of the claim of the deceased husband of the petitioner." 3. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the claim of the petitioner with respect to payment of medical claim has been rejected. 4. He submitted that this controversy involved in the present matter has already been settled in case of Pradeep Kumar Shukla Vs. U.P. Power Corporation Limited Lucknow, vide judgment and order dated September 2, 2025 and he has sought the same relief. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Smt. Manisha Singh, Dilip Kumar Verma, Pawan Kumar Dubey, Sandeep Kumar Ojha Counsel for Respondent(s) : Neerav Chitravanshi, Alok Saran Smt. Premvada Tiwari .....Petitioner(s) U.P. Power Corporation Ltd. Thru. Chairman Lko And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) 5. The counsel for the respondents- Corporation, though has opposed the matter on merits while submitting that the policy does not permit for payment of medical reimbursement, if the medical claim is submitted on the basis of some treatment in the Nursing Home but he could not dispute the identical controversy settled in case of Pradeep Kumar Shukla (supra). 6. Upon considering the same, the Office Memorandum as well as Order dated 18.6.2024 assailed herein above, is hereby kept in abeyance. The opposite party no.4- the Managing Director, Madhyanchal Vidhyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. is directed to consider the medical claim of the petitioner in light of the judgment and order passed in Pradeep Kumar Shukla (supra) within a period of six weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before him. 7. With the aforesaid observation, the present writ petition is hereby disposed of. November 21, 2025 Muk WRIA No. 7900 of 2024 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHD UMAR KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench