HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 1150 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Heard Ms. Vartika Pandey, Advocate, holding brief of Mr. Anurag Narain Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Rajan Mishra, learned counsel for the respondent no.3 and Sri Pradeep Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the State. It has been stated by Ms. Vartika Pandey that the present petition has become infructuous, thus, the same may be dismissed as having become infructuous. Learned counsel for the respondents have no objection to the submissions aforesaid. In view of the aforesaid, the present petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Consigned to the records. October 27, 2025 Ram Murti Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anurag Narain Srivastava, Chitrangada Narayan, Vartika Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mukesh Kumar Mishra, Rajan Mishra (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Nalin Kumar Gupta .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Co- Operative Deptt. Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAM MURTI YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench