IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 11053 of 2025 Date of Decision: 19.09.2025 _______________________________________________________ Jeet Kumari …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & others … Respondents ______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Adarsh Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Rajan Kahol, Mr. Vishal Panwar and Mr. B.C.Verma, Additional Advocate Generals, with Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General, for the respondent- State. Mr. Rajesh Kosh, Advocate, for respondent No.4. _______________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral): While placing on record communication dated 18.09.2025, issued under the signatures of Executive Engineer (B&R) Division, HPPWD, Kotkhai, Himachal Pradesh, Mr. Rajan Kahol, learned Additional Advocate General, states that the petitioner has deposited the Government share amounting to Rs. 2, 32, 268/- in the Government Treasury through challan on 11.09.2025 and thereafter, pension case of the petitioner has 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 been submitted to the office of Accountant General (A&E), Shimla vide letter dated 17.09.2025. 2. Having carefully perused the aforesaid communication, which is taken on record, there appears to be merit in the contention of learned Additional Advocate General. 3. Now in view of aforesaid development, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant petition and accordingly same is disposed of, with a direction to the office of Accountant General (A&E), Shimla to ensure that proposal for grant of pension in favour of the petitioner vide letter dated 17.09.2025, as detailed hereinabove, is processed expeditiously and thereafter, PPO, thereby authorizing the pension in favour of the petitioner, be issued within a period of three weeks. Needless to say, after issuance of PPO, thereby authorizing pension, arrears on account of pension, shall also be released in favour of the petitioner expeditiously, preferably within a period of two months. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (Sandeep Sharma), Judge September 19, 2025 (shankar)