CRM-M-5975-2025 -1- 209 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-5975-2025 Date of Decision:-25.04.2025 Sandeep Kumar @ Golu ...Petitioner Vs. State of Haryana and Anr. ...Respondents CORAM:-HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE AMARJOT BHATTI Present:- Mr. Sumit Dua, Advocate for petitioner. Ms. Aditi Girdhar, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Varun Dhanda, Advocate for respondent No.2. **** AMARJOT BHATTI, J. 1. The petitioner – Sandeep Kumar @ Golu has filed petition under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for grant of regular bail in FIR No.397 dated 26.12.2024, under Sections 74, 75(3), 127(2), 333, 351(3) of BNS 2023, registered at Police Station Kalayat, District Kaithal (Annexure P-1). 2. As per the facts of case, complainant Anju filed written complaint that on 26.12.2024 at about 1:30 PM, 03 ladies namely Nanhi, Krishna, Murti came to her house and told her to vacate the house otherwise there will be bloodshed. After some time, Sandeep @ Golu along with another person came there and started abusing her and pulled her by holding her hand. He threw away her mobile phone. He was armed with a gandasa and gave blow towards her head but she escaped the blow. Sunil Devi 2025.04.25 17:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-5975-2025 -2- He threatened to kill the entire family. He locked the main gate and sat outside holding a gandasa. After some time, her family members dialed No.112 and a video was also prepared. With these allegations, present FIR has been registered. 3. Learned counsel for petitioner argued that dispute is regarding the piece of land owned by the families. A family partition took place and land came to the share of father of the petitioner. Prior to the family partition, in-laws of the complainant had built a house, therefore, main dispute was regarding the property. Now matter has been compromised with the intervention of respectables of the society. He will abide by the terms of bail order. It is prayed that his regular bail petition may be allowed. 4. Bail petition is opposed by learned counsel representing State. Detailed status report has been filed. It is pointed out that petitioner is the main accused. Allegations are specific. He is involved in other FIRs also. Challan is already presented on 24.02.2025. Petitioner is in custody since 27.12.2024. Learned counsel for respondent No.2 confirmed the compromise arrived at between the parties and did not oppose the regular bail petition. 5. I have considered the aforesaid factual position. Petitioner has already joined the investigation and he is in judicial custody. At present matter has been compromised. Petitioner is ready to abide by the terms of bail order. Therefore, without expressing my mind on merits of the case, regular bail petition filed by petitioner – Sandeep Kumar @ Golu is allowed. He is ordered to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds and Sunil Devi 2025.04.25 17:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-5975-2025 -3- surety bonds to the satisfaction of trial Court/Duty Judge concerned. 6. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand disposed of accordingly as well. 25.04.2025 (AMARJOT BHATTI) Sunil Devi JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No Sunil Devi 2025.04.25 17:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document