Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 198949 (ALL)

REKHA SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT., LKO. AND OTHERS

WRIB/948/2025 · 2025-10-06

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - B No. - 948 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. Heard Ms. Hema Singh, learned counsel on behalf of the petitioner as well as learned Standing counsel on behalf of respondent No.s 1 to 4. 1. In light of the proposed order notice to the private respondent is dispensed with. 2. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the matter pertains to mutation with regard to the property of khata No.s 371 and gata No.s 598, 813, 273, 1455, 1702 Ga, 1703 Ga, 1704 Ga, 1709 Kha, 1832, 2173, 2296 and 2429 Kha situated in Village Barauli, Pargana Deva, Tehsil Nawabganj, District Barabanki. In the mutation proceedings opposite party No.5 had raised the objections and subsequently the revision was filed by opposite party No.5 before the Board of Revenue. In the revisional proceedings an interim order of status - quo was passed on 6.6.2025 against which the present writ petition has been preferred. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that opportunity of hearing was not granted to the petitioner when the interim order was passed and consequently the same is illegal and arbitrary. 4. It is also noticed that the petitioner has put in appearance before the 5. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Birendra Kumar Yadav, Hema Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Rekha Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt., Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) revisional court and also filed her objections. After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the grievance of the petitioner shall be substantially redressed in case the revisional authority is directed to consider and decide the revision with expedition. 6. Accordingly, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, the petition is disposed of with a direction to opposite party No.2 i.e. Board of Revenue, U.P., Lucknow to consider and decide revision bearing No.REV/2184/2025/Barabanki, computerized case No.R 20250412002184 (Renu Singh Vs. Rekha Singh and others), expeditiously, say within a period of six months from the date a certified copy of this order is placed before him, in accordance with law, if there is no legal hurdle. 7. The petitioner undertakes to cooperate in the said proceedings and not to take any unnecessary adjournment. 8. With aforesaid direction, the petition stands disposed of. 9. October 6, 2025 RKM. WRIB No. 948 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench