Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 198948 (ALL)

PRITI VAISHYA v. ASHOK KUMAR AND 13 OTHERS

A227/6264/2025 · 2025-10-17

S Q H Rizvi

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6264 of 2025 Court No. - 20 HON'BLE SYED QAMAR HASAN RIZVI, J. 1. Heard Sri Nitin Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. By means of this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for the following main reliefs: "(1.) Issue a direction commanding the Civil Judge (Junior Division) Room No. 15, Sultanpur to decide the pending interim injunction application 6 ga 2 pending in Regular Suit No. 675/2024 Priti Versus Ashok and others expeditiously within a time frame in the interest of justice. 2. Issue a direction commanding the parties to maintain status quo over the land in question. 3. Issue a direction commanding and directing the opposite party no. 1 to 3 not to alienate the land in question." 3. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that more than one year has passed and the application for interim injunction filed by the petitioner is pending before the Court of learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Room No. 15, Sultanpur in Original Suit No. 675/2024 (Priti Versus Ashok and Others). He submits that although the defendants in the said Suit have already put in their appearance in the proceeding but have not filed any objections thereby causing delay in the disposal of the injunction application. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has also drawn attention of this Court towards a copy of the order-sheet annexed with the present writ petition which reflects that the case has been adjourned on several dated due to non-availability of the Presiding Officer. 5. Taking into consideration the aforesaid facts, this Court is of the view that no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending, Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vivek Pandey, Hrishabh Singh, Nitin Srivastava, Saurabh Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : Priti Vaishya .....Petitioner(s) Ashok Kumar And 13 Others .....Respondent(s) therefore, the same is being disposed of at the admission stage itself. 6. In view of the proposed relief being sought, the issuance of notices to the private respondents is hereby dispensed with. 7. Therefore, without entering into the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of with the direction to the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Room No. 15, Sultanpur to decide the pending application for injunction filed by the petitioner in the aforesaid Original Suit No. 675 of 2025 (Priti Vs. Ashok And others), strictly in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order before him. October 17, 2025 (Manoj K.) A227 No. 6264 of 2025 2 (Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi,J.) Digitally signed by :- MANOJ KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench