Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 198941 (ALL)

MANAV VIKAS PARISHAD THRU ITS PRESIDENT RAGHVENDRA KUMAR MISHRA LKO v. THE UNION OF INDIA THRU MINISTERY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/3437/2022 · 2025-10-27

Prashant Kumar, Shekhar B Saraf

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 3437 of 2022 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. Learned counsel for petitioner states that certain dues of petitioner are still to be paid for which, a communication was made in the year 2021 by the respondents that the same are being processed. He further submits that grievance of petitioner would be sufficiently met in case representation of petitioner for the said purposes is considered and decided in a time bound manner. 3. Learned counsel for respondents have no objection to the same. 4. In view thereof, petitioner is permitted to make a fresh detailed representation to respondent no.3-President, Bal Shram Unmoolan Samiti, District Hardoi, raising all their grievance, annexing therewith a copy of this writ petition along with annexures and all the documents in support of their claim within a period of two weeks from today along with a certified copy of this order. 5. In case such a representation is moved by petitioner, respondent no.3 shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law by a reasoned and speaking order within a period of three months from the date, a Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anurag Singh, Amit Chandra, Manoj Kumar Tripathi, Utkarsh Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., C.S.C. Manav Vikas Parishad Thru Its President Raghvendra Kumar Mishra Lko .....Petitioner(s) The Union Of India Thru Ministery Of Labour And Employment And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) certified copy of this order along with representation is placed before him. 6. It is made clear that this court has not applied itself on the merits of the case and all questions are left open to be considered and decided by the competent authority in accordance with law. 7. With the aforesaid directions, present writ petition is disposed of. October 27, 2025 Ashutosh WRIC No. 3437 of 2022 2 (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench