HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 13324 of 2025 Court No. - 20 HON'BLE SYED QAMAR HASAN RIZVI, J. 1. Heard Shri Rajeshwar, learned counsel for petitioner, Shri Rajiv Singh Chauhan, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State/respondent nos. 1 and 2 and perused the material available on record. 2. Submission of learned counsel for petitioner is that the husband of the petitioner was a regular employee in the Vishesharnath Inter colleg,e Akbarpur, Ambedkar Nagar and was working on the post of Peon (Class- IV employee) but unfortunately died on 18.08.2025 during service. After the death of her husband, the petitioner requested to the respondents to consider her case for compassionate appointment under the Uttar Pradesh Recruitment of Dependants of Government Servants Dying in Harness Rules, 1974 on the existing vacancy. 3. The case of the petitioner is that despite several representations and reminders, the respondents did not have considered her case nor paid any heed. 4. Shri Rajiv Singh Chauhan, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State/respondent nos. 1 and 2 submits that he has no instructions regarding the pendency of the representation as alleged by the petitioner. 5. Be that as it may, if the representations as stated by the learned counsel Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rajeshwar, Deepika Goswami Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Kausari Fatma .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Secondary Education Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) for the petitioner, are pending for consideration, the same deserves final disposal. 6. Taking into consideration the submissions of learned counsel for parties, this Court is of the view that no useful purpose would be served to keep the writ petition pending. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed off at the admission stage itself by granting liberty to the petitioner to prefer a comprehensive representation narrating the facts in detail and all the pleas and grounds that are available to him under law, before the District Inspector of Schools (D.I.O.S.), Ambedkar Nagar within a period of ten days from today. In case such a representation is received by the opposite party no.2 within the time frame as provided by this Court here- in-above, the the District Inspector of Schools (D.I.O.S.), Ambedkar Nagar (respondent no. 2) shall seriously examine the case of the petitioner in the light of the relevant rules and guidelines issued by the Government. It is expected that the above-mentioned authority shall endeavour to dispose of the said representation within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of said representation by passing a reasoned order strictly in accordance with law. 11. With the aforesaid directions/observations, the present writ petition is disposed of. November 17, 2025 Virendra WRIA No. 13324 of 2025 2 (Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi,J.) Digitally signed by :- VIRENDRA KUMAR GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench