HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 6925 of 2024 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State and perused the record. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that one case has been shown against the applicant in the gang chart and in that case, the applicant has been enlarged on bail, bail order is annexed as Annexure No. 3 to the bail application. Apart from the said case in the gang chart, there is a criminal history of 6 other cases against the applicant which has been duly explained by the learned counsel for the applicant in paragraph- 8 of the bail application. He further submits that the applicant is in jail since 27.04.2024. 3. It is also submitted that co-accused persons namely Eidu @ Chhotu Kankali, Ramu Rawat and Jawa Rawat have been granted bail by the co- ordinate Bench of this court in Criminal Misc. Bail Application Nos. 4799 of 2024 and 4848 of 2024 vide orders dated 03.05.2024 and 06.05.2024 respectively. The applicant seeks parity with the bail orders. He further submits that the applicant is ready to furnish an undertaking in terms of requirement of Section 19(4)(b) of U.P. Gangsters & Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. 4. Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid facts as argued by the learned counsel for the applicant. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the nature of allegations, arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties, the fact that in the solitary case shown in the gang chart, the applicant has been granted bail, the bail order is on record as Annexure No. 3; the fact that co- accused persons namely Eidu @ Chhotu Kankali, Ramu Rawat and Jawa Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Firoz Ahmad Khan, Akhilendra Kumar Goswami, Neeraj Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Dilshad .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Deptt. Its Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home .....Opposite Party(s) Rawat have been granted bail vide orders dated 03.05.2024 and 06.05.2024 respectively and the applicant seeks parity with the bail orders, as also the period for which the applicant is in jail i.e. since 27.04.2024, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I find it to be a fit case for enlarging the applicant on bail. 6. Let the applicant- Dilshad, involved in Case Crime No. 110 of 2024, under Section 3(1) U.P. Gangsters & Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, P.S. Inayat Nagar, District Ayodhya be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs. 20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which she is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 21, 2025 DiVYa BAIL No. 6925 of 2024 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- DIVYA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench