MOHD. MUEEN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS PRIN. SECY. MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS LKO. AND ANOTHER
A482/8197/2025 · 2025-10-06
Saurabh Lavania
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 198905 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 198905 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 8197 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant(s) and learned AGA for the State as well as perused the record. 2. The present application has been filed by the applicant(s) for the following main relief(s):-
"(i) To issue a order or directions for quashing the impugned order dated 12.8.2025 passed by the court of Addl District & Sessions Judge court no10, Lucknow of as contained in annexure nol to the application and as well as the summoning dated 10.7.2023 passed by the court of A.C.J.M. court no 29 Lucknow as contained in annexure no. 2 to this petition."
3. At the very outset, learned counsel for the applicant(s) submitted that at this stage, he is confining his prayer to seek the benefit of the judgment(s) passed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, (2022) 10 S.C.R. 351 : (2022) 10 SCC 51 and Musheer Alam vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Another, 2025 SCC OnLine SC 116 for which liberty may be given to the applicant(s) and liberty may also be given to the applicant(s) to approach this Court again at appropriate stage for seeking appropriate relief. 4. Learned AGA has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicant(s). Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : S.Mohd Kazim, Pramod Kumar, Simran Parveen, Syed Jamal Ahmad Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Mohd. Mueen .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Ministry Of Home Affairs Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
5. Keeping in view the aforesaid, the present application is disposed of with liberty as prayed for. 6. Taking note of the facts of the case and also the observations made by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil (Supra) and Musheer Alam (Supra), this Court is of the view that it would be appropriate to observe that it is expected from the Police Officer concerned that for a period of 30 days from today, they would not take any coercive action against the applicant(s) in the aforesaid case. It is made clear that in this regard, no application shall be entertained.
October 6, 2025 Jyoti/- A482 No. 8197 of 2025 2 (Saurabh Lavania,J.) Digitally signed by :- JYOTI RAJWANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench