IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.83880 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-88 Year-2025 Thana- MOHIUDDIN NAGAR District- Samastipur ====================================================== 1. Parmeshwar Mahto @ Prmeshvar Mahto S/o Late Runa Mahto R/o Village - Maniyar Par, P.S - Mohiuddin Nagar, District - Samastipur 2. Shankar Mahto S/o Parmeshwar Mahto @ Prmeshvar Mahto R/o Village - Maniyar Par, P.S - Mohiuddin Nagar, District - Samastipur 3. Ranjan Kumar S/o Parmeshwar Mahto @ Prmeshvar Mahto R/o Village - Maniyar Par, P.S - Mohiuddin Nagar, District - Samastipur ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Abhay Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Surendra Prasad Singh, A.P.P. For the Informant : Mr. Ujjwal Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 3 17-03-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, informant and the State. 2. Petitioners apprehend arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 117(2), 74, 109(1), 352, 351(2), 351(3), 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. 3. As per F.I.R., on the alleged date and time, when informant was at his door, all the F.I.R. named accused persons, including these petitioners, came there and owing to the previous dispute, altercation took place in which it is alleged that petitioner no. 1 assaulted the sons of informant and Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.83880 of 2025(3) dt.17-03-2026 2/2 petitioner nos. 2 and 3 assaulted informant with hasua and daab. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that on account of land dispute between the parties, altercation took place in which both sides sustained injuries. Injuries sustained by the injured are simple in nature. Case and counter case. Petitioners claim clean antecedent. 5. Learned counsel for the informant vehemently opposed the bail application. 6. Considering the nature of accusation, injuries case and counter case and clean antecedent, this anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that let the above named petitioners in the event of their arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub- Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Samastipur in connection with Mohiuddinagar P. S. Case No. 88 of 2025, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. Navya/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T