Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 198897 (ALL)

KALP NATH VERMA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. NAGAR VIKAS GOVT. OF U.P. LKO. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/12340/2025 · 2025-10-17

Shree Prakash Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 12340 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Sahars, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State and perused the record. Instant petition has been filed with the following reliefs:- "(i) to issue writ order of direction in the nature of mandamus directing and commanding the opposite party no. 2 and 3 to make the payment of revised gratuity Rs. 43,749.00 to the petitioner in compliance of order dated 28.11.2024 contained in Annexure No. 6 to the writ petition, within some reasonable time. (ii) to issue writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing and commanding the opposite party no. 2 and 3 to make the payment of 2nd installment of arrear of pension Rs. 55,000/-to the petitioner within some reasonable time. (iii) to issue writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing and commanding the opposite parties to make the payment of interest to the petitioner on delayed payment at market rate, within some reasonable time. (iv) to issue any other writ order or direction which this Hon'ble court may deem just fit and proper under the circumstances of the case. (v) to allow the cost of the writ petition." After arguing at length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the interest of justice would be sub-served if this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to give liberty to the petitioner to move a fresh representation and the respondent no. 2 may be directed to consider & decide the same, within stipulated period of time as may be fixed by this Court. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Virendra Kumar Dubey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Kalp Nath Verma .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Nagar Vikas Govt. Of U.P. Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Learned counsel for the opposite parties have no objection to the contention aforesaid. Be that as it may, without entering into the merit of the case, the petitioner is permitted to move a fresh representation within period of 15 days, and if such representation is moved within aforesaid period, the respondent no. 2/Director Local Bodies, Sector-7, Gomti Nagar Extention, Lucknow, shall consider and decide the same, within a period of two months, in accordance with law, from the date, a certified copy of this order is produced before him. With the aforesaid observations, the instant petition is disposed of. October 17, 2025 Mayank WRIA No. 12340 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench