DR. MANISH KHANNA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. MEDICAL @ HEALTH LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIA/12045/2025 · 2025-10-17
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 198865 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 198865 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 12045 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner, learned State Counsel for opposite party No.1 and Mr. Gyanendra Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for opposite party Nos.2 & 4.
2. In view of order being passed, issuance of notice to opposite party No.3 shall stand dispensed with.
3. Petition has been filed seeking following relief(s):-
"(i) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus thereby commanding and directing the opposite party No.2 to issue a necessary order/direction to the opposite party No.3 for releasing the AEBAS attendance of the petitioner from Mayo Institute of Medical Sciences Gadiya, Barabanki (Opp.party No. 3) as petitioner has been appointed as Professor Orthopedic Department Rajarshi Dashrath Swashashi Rajya Chikitsa Mahavidyalaya, Ayodhya on contract basis since 7.7.2025."
4. It appears that primary grievance of petitioner is against opposite party No.3, i.e., Mayo Institute of Medical Sciences, Barabanki which admittedly is a private organization and therefore does not come within purview of Article 12 of the Constitution of India.
5. Nonetheless, learned counsel for petitioner submits that the said Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Hari Shanker Tewari, Ajay Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Gyanendra Kumar Srivastava Dr. Manish Khanna .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Medical @ Health Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
Institute, although private, is under supervisory control of the National Medical Commission, New Delhi and is also affiliated to Atal Bihari Bajpai Medical University, U.P., Lucknow and therefore liberty may be granted to petitioner to approach either of the aforesaid organizations for redressal of his grievance.
6. In view of such submissions, liberty so sought is granted to petitioner to approach either of the said authorities who may consider and decide petitioner's grievance.
7. With the aforesaid direction(s), petition stands disposed of. October 17, 2025 lakshman WRIA No. 12045 of 2025 2 (Manish Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- LAKSHMANA KUMAR TAMMANA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench