HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14908 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, Shri Raghvendra Pratap Singh, learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent no. 1, Sri Anurag Tripathi, learned counsel for respondent no.2 and Shri Sandeep Sharma and Shri Anagh Shukla who files his Vakalatnama on behalf of respondent no.3. With the consent of learned counsel appearing for the contesting parties, the instant writ petition is being finally decided. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:- "1. Issue a writ, order, or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite party No-2 i.e. Managing Director UP Bhumi Sudhar Nigam Lucknow to make payment of difference of leave encasement, Gratuity, City compensation Allowance, House Rent Allowance, 12% employer contribution of EPF, deference of dearness and deputation allowance to the petitioner for the period of deputation along with admissible interest, within stipulated period, in the interest of justice. 2. Issue a writ or order in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite party No-2 i.e. Managing Director UP Bhumi Sudhar Nigam Lucknow to consider the claim of petitioner for grant dues i.e. 12% employer contribution of EPF, difference of Gratuity, difference of leave encashment Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pradeep Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Anagh Shukla, Anurag Tripathi, Sandeep Sharma Yogendra Singh Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Parti Bhumi Vikas Deptt., Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) and difference of dearness allowance of deputation period within stipulated period, in the interest of justice. 3. Issue any other writ or direction, as this Hon'ble court may deem fit and proper under the circumstances of the case. 4. Allow the writ petition with cost." The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that for the claims the petitioner has moved a representation before the respondent No.2. Considering the fact that the petitioner has already represented the matter, therefore, the present petition is disposed of permitting the petitioner to file a fresh representation before the respondent No.2 who is directed to pass an order in accordance with law within a period of six weeks. In case the petitioner is found to be entitled for any benefits , the same shall be extended and paid to the petitioner within a further period of three months. December 19, 2025 V. Sinha WRIA No. 14908 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench