KARAN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO.
BAIL/6332/2025 · 2025-10-15
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 198858 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 198858 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 6332 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned AGA for the State and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No. 155 of 2024, under Sections 238, 103(1), 70(1) BNS, P.S. Itaunja, District- Lucknow. 3. In terms of the FIR, it has been alleged that the wife of the informant was having illicit relations with one Monu and subsequently, her body was found and apprehension was misplaced against Monu. In the statement of Monu, the name of applicant was surfaced in the present case. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant has drawn the attention of this Court to the informant who stated that he had never taken the name of Monu and the name of the applicant along with the accomplice was taken only on the basis of suspicion. Thus, the informant has not supported the allegation levelled against the applicant. 5. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 6. Considering the fact that in the statement of Monu, the name of applicant has been surfaced in the present case coupled with the fact that the applicant is in jail since 29.09.2024 having no criminal history, he is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 6. Let the applicant Karan be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Chandra Shekhar Singh Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Karan .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
(b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which she is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
October 15, 2025 V. Sinha BAIL No. 6332 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench