IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE i PRESENT ^ the honourable dr justice Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 14076 OF AMARAVATI OF MAY i Between: Sri Chandramouleshwara Swamv Anna Satram qiwoi ...Petitioner AND ...Respondents , Petition under Article 226 the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more of the Constitution of India praying that in the High Court may particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus tryino to disn respondent No. 1 in Ac2 63ct T"'' agricultural land total extent Ac. .6 cts re, Ac.0.63cts in Sy.No. 187/3, Ac.1.49cts in Sy No 293 and A 0.5 cts ,n sy. No. 97 Anumanchipalli village, Jaggaiahpet District without following ^ mandal, NTR as arbitrary, illegal and due process of law contrary to Sec.83 of the A.P. Charitable Hindu Religious and Endowments ^ Act and consequently direct the respondent No.1 not to dispossess the petitioner from the agricultural land total extent Ac.2.63cts i.e, Ac.0.63cts in Sy.No.187/3, Ac.1.49cts in Sy.No.293 and Ac. 0.51 cts in Sy. No. 97 of Anumanchipalli village, Jaggaiahpet mandal, NTR District without following due process of law in the interest of justice. lA NQ: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No.1 not to dispossess the petitioner from the agricultural land total extent Ac.2.63cts i.e, Ac.0.63cts in Sy.No. 187/3, Ac.1.49cts in Sy.No.293 and Ac.0.51cts in Sy.No.97 of Anumanchipalli village, Jaggaiahpet mandal, NTR district without following due process of law pending disposal of the writ petition in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI. P NAGENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR ENDOWMENTS The Court made the following order: APHC010279232025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] I THURSDAY,THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 14076/2025 Between: Sri Chandramouleshwara Swamy Anna Satram ...PETITIONER AND Sri Chandramouleeshwara Swamivari Devasthanam and ...RESPONDENT(S) others Counsel for the Petitioner: P Nagendra Reddy Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP for Endowments The Court made the following: ORDER: The grievance of the petitioner in this writ petition is that the petitioner has been in possession of the property and the respondent/temple has been trying to dispossess the petitioner from the property without followirig the due process of law as contemplated under Section 83 of the A.P Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act, 1987 (for short ‘the Act.,’). The petitioner to buttress that he has been in possession and enjoyment of the property and he has filed certain land cist receipts wherein it is evident that the petitioner is in the possession of the property. 2 Dr.\ W/-P-NO.14076 o^2l Dated 29.05*20 * '■espondent possession of 2- On the other hand submits that the property. The Chandramouleshwara A bare perusal of the that Sri the learned Standing Counsel petitioner has not filed for the any proof that he is in the land cist receipts show Swamy Anna Satram is i that it’s only Sri 's in possession of the property. = it would show tiding represented land sistu Chandramouleshwara Managing Trustee Pillalamarri receipts tiled by the petitioner Swamy Anna Satram iIS by ' Krishna Sharma. 2- At any rate, the 1 without following the respondent is not supposed to evict the Of course, the petitioner petitioner has to due process of law. approach the endowments tribunal for his grievance. 4. Be that as it inasmuch as he has been i may, the petitioner i in the possession of the 's required to be oigiven protection property for quite long time. 5- In view of the facts disposed of, directing the 1®* following due There shall be As a and circumstances of the respondent not to case, the writ petition iIS evict the petitioner, contemplated under Section without 83 of ‘the Act’. process of law, as no order as to costs, sequel, interlocutory applications. Iif any pending, shall Stand closed. ..jJ Sd/- M SRINIVAS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //true copy// SECfi^^FICER To. 1. The Executive Officer ,Sri Chandramouieeshwara NTR District Swamivari Devasthanam, Jaggaiahpet town 2. The Principal Secretary, state of Andhra Department, Secretariat, Velaaaoridi Pradesh, Endowments 3. One CC to Sri. P Nagendra Reddy Advocate [OPUC] 4. Two CCs to GP for Endowments, High Court of Andhra Pradesh[OUT] 5. Three CD Copies GSC HIGH COURT DATED:29/05/2025 ORDER WP.No.14076 of 2025 DISPOSING THE WP WITHOUT COSTS