SUNIL YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
CRLA/1405/2025 · 2025-10-09
Pramod Kumar Srivastava
Criminal Appealbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 198816 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 198816 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 1405 of 2025 Court No. - 28 HON'BLE PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the due to conviction of the appellant, the appeal has become infructuous, therefore, the same may be dismissed as infructuous. In view of the above, the appeal is dismissed as having become infructuous. October 9, 2025 Arvind Versus Counsel for Appellant(s) : Ramakar Shukla, Anamika Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Pramod Kumar Srivastava,J.) Sunil Yadav .....Appellant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ARVIND KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench