Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 198810 (ALL)

IJLASA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE AND 5 OTHERS

WRIC/10110/2025 · 2025-10-15

Prashant Kumar, Shekhar B Saraf

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10110 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State. 2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the respondents in deciding the representation dated 24.07.2025 filed by the petitioner. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that raising his grievances the petitioner has filed the aforesaid representation before the respondent authority, however, the same has not yet been decided. 4. Upon due consideration, we are of the view that the respondent No. 3 i.e. Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil Kadipur, Sultanpur should be directed to pass a reasoned order upon the representation of the petitioner. 5. Accordingly, the respondent No. 3 i.e. Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil Kadipur, Sultanpur is directed to pass a reasoned order upon the aforesaid representation of the petitioner in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from date after granting opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. 6. Furthermore, it is to be noted that a new auction publication has been Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Awanish Kumar Upadhyay Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh Ijlasa .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) issued by the respondents authorities on 23.06.2025. 7. Counsel for the respondents submits that auction has still not taken place due to various reasons and fairly submits that the petitioner may also be allowed to participate in the same, if he makes an application immediately. 8. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to make an application within seven days from the date. If such an application is made within a period of seven days as per the publication dated 23.06.2025, the application shall be considered along with other applications that have been made by the other bidders. 9. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. October 15, 2025 Anupam S/- WRIC No. 10110 of 2025 2 (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUPAM SINGH PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench