FURQAN AND 3 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
/2012/2025 · 2025-12-08
Brij Raj Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 198805 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 198805 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 2012 of 2025 Court No. - 16 HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned AGA appearing for the State- opposite parties no.1 and 2 and Sri Gouliya Yadav, learned counsel who has filed power on behalf of opposite party no.3.
2. By means of this application, the applicants have prayed for quashing of the entire proceedings of Case Crime No.174 of 2025, under Sections 109, 352, 351(2) (3) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, Police Station Gosaiganj, District Sultanpur, pending in the court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No.21, Sultanpur.
3. After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the applicants states that he does not want to press this application on merit, however, he submits that liberty may be given to the applicants to file an application for discharge under the provisions of Cr.P.C., to which learned counsel for the opposite parties do not have any objection.
4. Accordingly, the applicants are granted liberty to file an application for discharge before the court concerned at the appropriate stage and the same shall be considered and decided by the court concerned in accordance with law.
5. With the aforesaid observations/directions, this application stands disposed of. December 8, 2025 Rao/- Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Bhagwati Prasad Nigam, Anurag Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Brij Raj Singh,J.) Furqan And 3 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 2 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- CHEBROLU SRINIVASA RAO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench