RAJESH RAJBHAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO.
BAIL/7431/2025 · 2025-12-10
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 198753 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 198753 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 7431 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record.
2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.108 of 2025, under Sections 64(2)(K) of BNS, Police Station Kotwali Tanda, District Ambedkar Nagar.
3. In terms of the FIR, it was alleged that on 16.04.2025 at about 5:30 PM, the daughter of the informant aged about 27 years had gone out of home when the applicant took her at a separate place and committed wrong on her. It is stated that the victim is not having stable mental condition. The statement of the victim under Section 180 of BNSS could not be recorded properly and the same was taken with the help of a person. The medical on record done after three days of the incident does not corroborate the allegation.
4. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the bail prayer.
5. Considering the medical examination report not corroborating the allegation and the fact that the applicant has no criminal antecedents and is languishing in jail since 20.04.2025, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Nijam Ahamad Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Rajesh Rajbhar .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
6. Let the applicant Rajesh Rajbhar be released on bail in the abovesaid first information report number on his furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. December 10, 2025 akverma BAIL No. 7431 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench