Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19875 (AP)

DADI THRINAD @ PRASAD v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

CRLP/5763/2025 · 2025-06-04

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PR'ADESH AT AMAR THURSDAy, THE FIFTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE :PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA Between : RAO KU CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 5763 OF 2025 ".ty,,.,.,,+ '\ 1. Dadi Thrinad @ prasad, s/o Dadi Adi Sanyasi Rao Aged about 2.7 years, Occ- Cloths business R/o.D. 19-3-24, Pallapu Street, Near Munl-cipal bungalow Gavarapalem, Anakapalle, Visakhapatnam District. 2. Dadi Kishore, s/o Dadi Srinivas Aged about 27 years, Occ- Supervisor, R/o.D. 15/12-32/6, Konathala Chinnayya Gari Street, Gavarapalem, AnakapaIIe, Visakhapatnam DistrI-Ct. 3. Maddala MuralI', S/o M.Ramakrishna Aged about 25 years, Occ- System Operator @ Mee Seva R/o.H.No. 19-5-82/1 Gavarapalem, Anakapalle, visakhapatnam District. 4. Budda Lokesh, S/o Satyanarayana Aged about 27 years, Occ- Preparing competitive exams R/o.D.No. 17-5-164, Santhi Street, Near Vinayaka Temple Gavarapalem, Anakapalle, Visakhapatnam DI|StriCt. 5. Kandregula Veeru Naidu, S/o K.Srinivas Aged about 25 years, Occl Preparing competitive exams R/o.D. 19-4-27/1,Pallapu Street, Nea;- Municipal bungalow Gavarapalem, AnakapaIIe, Visakhapatnam District. i ...Petitioners/Accused 1-5 AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor Hl'gh Court of A.P. Amaravathi, Guntur District through Anakapam Town Police Station, Anakapalli. ...Respondent/Comp[ainant Petition under section 438 of Cr.P.C/ Under Sectl-on 482 of BNSS PrayI'ng that in the circumstances stated in the memorandum of grounds filed in support of the CrimI-nal Petition, the HI'gh Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent-police to enlarge the petitioners /Accused No.1 to 5 on bail in FIR No. 14 OF 2025 on the file of the Anakapalli Town Police Station in the event of arrest by granting antI-CiPatOry bail. The Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the petition and the; memorandum of grounds filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of SRI CHAKRADHARA RAJA Y Advocate for the petitioners, and of PUBLIC PROSECUTOIR, for the Respondent, the court made the following i, .i=?a,,E'}+?-I-r-_.i?..-+. EREjRE`egys:: I:. ` ` + ¥ THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 5763/2025 ORDER: This Criminal Petition under section 482 of B.N.S.S., is filed by the petitioners herein/Al to A5 seeking {o grant anticipatory bail in FIR No.14 of 2025 of Anakapalli Police Station, Anakapalli District, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 115 (2),118(1 ), 351 (2) r/w BNS. 2. Brief facts of the prosecution arethat, on 14.01.2025 at ll pm, atussle took place between the defacto complainant's brother and the lst petitioner/A- 1. After knowing about the incI-dent, the defacto complainant went to the scene of offence and noticed that that the petitioners 1 & 2 /A-1 & A-2 and others were attempting to stab and beat his brother, while trying to rescue hI'S brother, the de-facto complainant also sustained injuries. It is further alleged that they have also taken his gold chaI-n. Hence, the FIR. 3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. P. Akhila Naidu, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the defacto complainan{ and petitioners 1 and 2 belongs to same region and they know themselves with each other. He submits that due to personal egos between the petitioners 1 and 2 and defacto complainantJs brother, the disputes have cropped up among the defacto complainantJs family and accused No.1, as such, at the political instances, the present FIR was emanated. 5. On the contrary, the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor states that there are specific allegations against the petitioners 1 & 2/A-1 & A-2 and investigation also reveals about their connec{ivity along with the other PetI'tiOnerS 3 to 5/A-3 to A-5 in the offences on hand. Hence, she opposes for granting bail. - ¥\ 6. perused the materlal on record. 7 The FIR dISCIOSes{henamesofthepetltloners 1 &2/A-1 &A-2onlyand there ls no speclflC reference about the names of petltIOnerS 3 to 5/A-3 to A-5 The FIR further reveals the speclfIC averments agalnst the A-1 and A-2 only lt I'S also brought to the notlce of thls court that petjtIOner No 3/ A-3 IS WOrkl'ng as a system operator at Mee-seva and petitl-oner Mos.4 & 5,JA-4 & A-5 are preparing for the competitive examjnatjons. 8 consfderlng the above facts and clrCumstances of the case ln Its tOtallty, the antlcIPatOry ba" In respect of petftloners 1 & 2/A_1 & A_2 IS dJSm'SSed •:-,=k+,(l- H^\A/-I/__ 1|_ --`_| \J However, the antl'cjpatory ba" jn so far as the granted with the followl-ng conditions.I L ln the event of arrest of the petitioners petl-tl-oners shall be enlarged on bail on executj a sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees ten thousand each for the like sum each to the satisfaction lnvestl-gating offl'cer,I The petltlOners 3 to 5/A-3 to A-5 sha" mark their the Invest,'gatl-ng offI'Cer once jn a fortnl-ght I-.e., o every month between 10.00 A.M and o1:00 P.M., charge sheet. l'ij. The petjtJ-Oners 3 to 5/A-3 to A-5 she" make themselves 3 to 5/A-3 to A-5, I-S to A-5, the hal bond for Wo sureties oncerned lnvestlgatjOn by a poll'ce officer as and when requl-red, an not, dI-reCtly or l'ndl-rectly, make any inducement, threat or any Person acquainted with the facts of the case so a`s {o her from disclosI'ng such facts to the court or to any poll-ce Accordingly, the Crjmjnal petjtI'On ,'s partly allowed. __I. rd>~trdJ1*_ll-|!l,reJieie .3~±;;I:ZS:fsI =ro-i~.' _ _ ~__ //TRUE COPY// F ~. To, 1. The Station House Officer, Anakapalli Town Police Station, Anakapalli District 2. One CC to SRI. CHAKRADHARA RAJA Y Advocate [OPUC] 3. Two cos to PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 4. One spare copy PSR * HIGH COURT MRK,J DATED : 05/06/2025 BAIL ORDER CRLP.No.5763 of 2025 ALLOWED iinEffiIRE REREEEEi )gke.*