Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19874 (RAJ)

UMAR KHAN S/O RASHID KHAN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/8093/2025 · 2025-05-26

Anoop Kumar Dhand

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8093/2025 Umar Khan S/o Rashid Khan, Aged About 52 Years, R/o Mirzapur, Gangapur City, District Sawai Madhopur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Chief Secretary, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. The Collector, District Gangapur City. 3. Tehsildar, Tehsil Sawai Madhopur, District Sawai Madhopur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Aradhana Swami For Respondent(s) : JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 26/05/2025 1. By way of filing this writ petition, a prayer has been made for issuing directions to the respondents to handover the possession of the auctioned property to the petitioner. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the property in question was purchased by the petitioner in an auction and he has deposited the entire sale consideration amount. Counsel submits that orders have been passed by the Tehsildar, Sawai Madhopur on 22.07.2024 for handing over the possession of the auctioned land to the petitioner. Counsel submits that in-spite of passing of more than 10 months, till date the possession of the auctioned land has not been handed over to the petitioner. Counsel submits that for (2 of 2) [CW-8093/2025] the aforesaid inaction on the part of the respondent- authorities, a representation in the form of legal notice was served by the petitioner in the office of the respondents i.e. Collector and Tehsildar, Sawai Madhopur in the month of February, 2025, but in-spite of passing of considerable time, the said representation submitted by the petitioner has not been decided by them by passing a reasoned and speaking order, so appropriate directions be issued to them to do the needful. 3. Considering the submissions made by the counsel for the petitioner and looking to the fact that the matter is subjudice before the respondents since July, 2024 and the representation submitted by the petitioner in the month of February, 2025 has not been decided by them, in-spite of passing of considerable time, this Court deems it just and proper to dispose of the instant writ petition with directions to the Collector and Tehsildar, Sawai Madhopur to decide the representation/legal notice of the petitioner, expeditiously, as early as possible, preferably within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order by passing a reasoned and speaking order. 4. With the aforesaid observations, the instant writ petition stands disposed of. The stay application and all pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J KUD/20