Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19874 (CHH)

MAHESH KUMAR JAIN (Kumar not mention in FIR) v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/650/2021 · 2025-07-09

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:31836-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 650 of 2021 1 - Mahesh Kumar Jain (Kumar Not Mention In FIR) S/o Ajar Ram Jain Aged About 55 Years R/o Bhirawahi, Sidhesar, Distt. Uttar Baster Kanker Chhattisgarh 2 - Parmanand Nagwanshi (Name Completely Not Mention) S/o Shyamsunder Nagwanshi Aged About 52 Years R/o House No. 187, Ward No. 10 Chawad, Distt. Uttar Baster Kanker 3 - Rameshwar Jaiswal S/o Abhay Ram Jaiswal Aged About 58 Years R/o House No. 183, Samta Nagar, Govindpur, Kanker Chhattisgarh 4 - Ashok Jain S/o Siyaram Jain Aged About 51 Years R/o House No. 92, Village Dhokuna, Junvani, Distt. Uttar Baster Kanker Chhattisgarh, 5 - Narottam Jain (Wrongly Mention As Sinha) Kuwar Singh Jain Aged About 59 Years R/o Dhekuna , Junwani, Narharpur, District Uttar Baster Kanker. 6 - Lila Ram Sinha S/o Mansha Ram Sinha Aged About 58 Years R/o 47 Khas Para, Ward No. 10, Unkar, Distt. Uttar Baster Kanker Chhattisgarh 7 - Manohar Ram Jain S/o Chaituram Jain Aged About 67 Years R/o Ward No. 8, Nanandanmara, Makdisingrai Distt. Uttar Baster Kanker Chhattisgarh ... Petitioners versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through In Charge Police Station Kanker, District U.B.Kanker BABLU RAJENDRA BHANARKAR Digitally signed by BABLU RAJENDRA BHANARKAR Date: 2025.07.10 17:13:08 +0530 2 2 - Kheduram Jain S/o Late Shriram Jain Aged About 60 Years R/o Dekuna Narharpur, Distt. U.B. Kanker ... Respondent(s) For Petitioners : Mr.Parag Kotecha, Advocate For Respondent No.1/State : Mr.Saumya Rai, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon’ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 10.07.2025 1. Heard Mr.Parag Kotecha, learned counsel for the petitioners as well as Mr.Saumya Rai, learned Panel Lawyer appearing for respondent No.1/State. 2. The instant petition has been filed by the petitioners with following prayer: “It is, therefore, prayed that this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to set aside / quash the FIR no.0014/2020 dated 9/1/2020 (Annexure P-1) and the proceedings initiated pursuant to Crime No.14/2020 registered before the Police Station Kanker Distt Uttar Baster Kanker for the alleged offences punishable under sections 4 The Protection of Civil Right Act 1955 in the interest of justice.” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that after filing of the charge-sheet, charge has been framed and evidence is being 3 recorded and as such, he does not want to press this petition. 4. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as not pressed without any further liberty. Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE Bablu