HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 5260 of 2024 Court No. - 30 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J. HON'BLE PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned AGA for the State and perused the record. 2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners has made a statement at the Bar that in the instant case, investigation has already been concluded and the final report has also been submitted in favour of the petitioners and as such, the instant writ petition has rendered infructuous. 3. Learned AGA for the State could not dispute the aforesaid facts. 4. In view of the statement made, this writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. November 17, 2025 Nadim Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shamshad Ahmad Khan Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Pramod Kumar Srivastava,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Baby Yadav And Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Civil Sectt. Lko And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NADIM ALAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench