RAMA SHANKAR PANDEY v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. AGRICULTURE EDU. AND RESEARCH LKO. AND 4 OTHERS
WRIA/12591/2025 · 2025-10-17
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 198702 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 198702 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 12591 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Sri Satyanshu Ojha, Advocate, has put in appearance by way of filing Vakalatnama on behalf of opposite parties no. 3 to 5 and the same is taken on record. Heard Sri H.L.Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Raghvendra Pratap Singh for opposite parties no. 1 and 2 and Sri Satyanshu Ojha, learned counsel for the opposite parties no. 3,4 and
5. By means of this petition the petitioner has prayed following relief :
"i) Issue a writ, order and direction in the nature of mandamus to commanding the opposite parties to consider and make the payment of post retiral dues and pension under 'Old Pension Scheme' and Paid the pension and other post retiral dues in accordance to the Old Pension Scheme to the Petitioner, with all consequential benefit, within time stipulated by this Hon'ble Court. ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties to make the payment of post retiral dues and pension, as per
judgment passed by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Prem Singh v. State of U.P. and Others reported in 2019 (10) SCC 516 as well as Writ - A No. 8968 of 2022 decided on 17.02.2023 within the time stipulated by this Hon'ble Court."
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that ends of justice Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Hanumant Lal Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Prashant Kumar Singh Rama Shankar Pandey .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Agriculture Edu. And Research Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s)
would suffice if he is allowed to move a fresh representation before the opposite party no. 3 and the same may be directed to dispose it of with speaking and reasoned order within stipulated time. With the consent of parties the writ petition is disposed of finally at the admission stage. Without entering into the merits of the issue, the petitioner is permitted to move a fresh representation within 15 days before the opposite party no. 3 i.e. Vice Chancellor, Narendra Dev University of Agriculture & Technology, Kumarganj, District Ayodhaya taking all his pleas and grounds and enclosing his earlier representations along with all relevant documents. If such a representation is moved the opposite party concerned is directed to dispose of the representation of the petitioner with speaking and reasoned order after affording an opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, strictly in accordance with law expeditiously, say within a period of two months from the date of production of the certified copy of this order. The decision on the representation shall be communicated to the petitioner forthwith. Writ petition is finally disposed of. October 17, 2025 AKS WRIA No. 12591 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench