MOHD. JAKIR @ MOLANA JAKIR AND 5 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. HOME GOVT. OF U.P. LKO. AND ANOTHER
A482/9898/2025 · 2025-11-21
Brij Raj Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 198692 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 198692 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 9898 of 2025 Court No. - 16 HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the State of U.P. and perused the record. 2. This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicants praying for quashing of the entire proceeding pending before the Learned court of JM(III) Lucknow relating to Criminal Case No- 64069 of 2025 (CNR- UPLK040640692025) arising out of crime No- 0756 of 2017 under sections-406 IPC at P.S. -Mandiaon, District- Lucknow and the charge-sheet dated 6-9-2020 submitted in the said Criminal Case, contained as Annexure-1 to the instant application, in respect of the applicants. 3. Learned counsel for the applicants has submitted that that the parties have entered into compromise. He further submitted that vide order dated 02.09.2025 a direction was given to the trial court to verify the factum of compromise executed by the parties. In pursuance of the aforesaid order, learned trial court had verified the contents of compromise vide order dated 11.09.2025. 4. Learned A.G.A. has fairly conceded that compromise has been effected between the parties and the same has duly been verified by the trial court. 5. Hon'ble Apex Court in catena of decisions has held that inherent power can be used to do real and substantial justice as has been held in Gian Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sunendra Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Mohd. Jakir @ Molana Jakir And 5 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home Govt. Of U.P. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
Singh Vs State of Punjab, 2012 AIR SCW 5333, B.S. Joshi and others Vs State of Haryana, (2003) 3 SCC 675 and Narinder Singh Vs State of Punjab, (2014) 6 SCC 466. Hence, inherent power can be exercised to speed up the process of ending the criminal proceedings where the settlement is arrived at between the parties. 6. In view of the aforesaid and the fact, no useful purpose would be served in proceeding with the matter further. 7. For the discussions made above, the present application is allowed.
The proceedings pending before the Learned court of JM(III) Lucknow relating to Criminal Case No-64069 of 2025 (CNR- UPLK040640692025) arising out of crime No-0756 of 2017 under sections-406 IPC at P.S. -Mandiaon, District-Lucknow and the charge- sheet dated 6-9-2020 submitted in the said Criminal Case, contained as Annexure-1 to the instant application, in respect of the applicants, are hereby quashed. November 21, 2025 A.Nigam A482 No. 9898 of 2025 2 (Brij Raj Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench