HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 9524 of 2025 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE ABDUL SHAHID, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned AGA for the State and Ms. Sonam, learned advocate has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of opposite party no.2, taken on record. 2. Along with learned counsel for the petitioners, the counsel appearing on behalf of opposite party no.2 has submitted that both the parties had entered into the compromise in compliance with the order dated 17.10.2025, passed by this Court in the case of Kadir Balmiki alias Kadir vs. State of UP and another being Application u/S 482 No.9007 of 2025. 3. The Court had directed in the aforesaid order dated 17.10.2025 that if the parties appear before the concerned court in terms of the above, the concerned court shall proceed to verify the compromise between the parties and prepare a report to the same effect. The original compromise be also directed to be made part of the record. 4. Thereafter, the parties had approached the concerned trial court. 5. The learned trial court, i.e., the Judicial Magistrate-II, Lucknow passed order on the basis of the compromise and accepted the compromise between the parties on 29.10.2025 in Case No.74088 of 2025 arising out of Case Crime No.48 of 202 under Sections 498-A, 323, 307, 504, 506 IPC and Section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 registered at Police Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sudhir Kumar, Shamsher Yadav Jagrana Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Sonam Kadir Balmiki @ Kadir And 2 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt., Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Station-Hasanganj, District-Lucknow. The certified copies filed by both the petitioners are with this writ petition as Annexure-7. 6. Both the parties have agreed that they had entered into the compromise and now 'no-dispute' is left amongst them. 7. It is submitted by learned counsel for opposite party No.2/the complainant that if the proceedings are dropped and quashed in terms of the said compromise, she has no objection to it. 8. In view of all facts, reasons and circumstances; and especially noticing the fact that the parties had entered into the compromise, the entire criminal proceedings of summoning order dated 22.9.2021 passed by the court of Judicial Magistrate-II, Lucknow pending before it and the charge-sheet No.1 of 2020 dated 21.12.2020 under Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, Police Station-Hasanganj, District-Lucknow, are hereby quashed. 9. Resultantly, the present case is allowed finally. November 14, 2025 LNTripathi A482 No. 9524 of 2025 2 (Abdul Shahid,J.) Digitally signed by :- LALIT TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench