Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 198688 (ALL)

BIND KISHORE v. UNION OF INDIA THRU. PRIN. SECY. MINI. OF FINANCE DEPTT. OF ECO. AFFAIRS INS. DIVISION AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/3556/2025 · 2025-10-27

Shree Prakash Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:66202 Court No. - 18 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 3556 of 2025 Petitioner :- Bind Kishore Respondent :- Union Of India Thru. Prin. Secy. Mini. Of Finance Deptt. Of Eco. Affairs Ins. Division And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Arvind Kumar,Prakhar Srivastava,Virendra Prasad Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,Anil Kumar Srivastava,Arvind Kumar Hon'ble Shree Prakash Singh,J. Case called out. No one is present for the Union of India. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Neeraj Awasthi, Advocate, holding brief of Sri Anil Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the opposite parties no. 2 to 4 and perused the record. Learned counsel for the petitioner has confined his prayer that since the petitioner has been granted the Pay Scale II;since the year 2005, therefore, he is entitled for Scale-III and Scale-IV since the year 1998-1999, which has not been accorded to him. He submitted that the petitioner is 80 years of age and he has already submitted a representation on 22-01-2025 before the opposite party no. 3/Chairman-Cum-Managing Director, United India Insurance Co. Ltd., Chennai and the same is pending consideration. He further submits that the interest of justice would be sub-served if this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to direct the opposite party no. 3 to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner within the stipulated period of time, as may be fixed by this court. Learned counsel appearing for the opposite parties no. 2 to 4 has no objection to the contentions aforesaid. In view of the aforesaid innocuous prayer of the learned counsel for the petitioner and particularly, the admission on the part of the respondent-authorities that due to miscalculation, the promotional scales could not be granted to the petitioner and number of junior persons to the petitioner, have also been promoted,the opposite party no.3/Chairman-Cum-Managing Director, United India Insurance Co. Ltd., Chennai, is directed to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner dated 22-01-2025 within a period of three months, in accordance with law, from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before him, with speaking and reasoned order. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 27.10.2025 AKS WRIA No. 3556 of 2025 2 Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench