HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10649 of 2025 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE DIVESH CHANDRA SAMANT, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. Sri Kshitij Singh, Advocate as well Sri Shivam Singh, Adovate has put in appearance on behalf of opposite party No.2 and has filed vakalatanama which is taken on record. 3. The present 482 Cr.P.C. application has been filed to quash the proceeding of Case No. 1900 of 2019 (State Vs. Shubendra Pratap Singh and Ors.) Under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 504, 506 and 308 I.P.C. pending before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Faizabad as well as to stay the operation and enforcement of the impugned summoning orders dated 12.06.2025 as well as the proceedings of Case No. 1900 of 2019 (State Vs. Shubhendra Pratap Singh and Ors.) under Section 147, 148, 149, 323, 504, 506 and 308 I.P.C. pending before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Faizabad. 4. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that now parties have entered into compromise, therefore, this Court may please to quash the proceeding for which learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 and 3 has no objection. 5. Whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the Court below as such compromise has to be duly Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rajesh Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Kshitij Singh Shubhendra Pratap Singh And 4 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) verified in presence of the parties concerned before the Court. 6. Accordingly, this application is disposed of with a direction to the court concerned that if any such compromise is filed before it within two weeks, it shall issue notices to all the signatories to the compromise requiring their personal presence and, thereafter, proceed to verify the compromise within two weeks. If the aforesaid compromise is verified, a report to that effect shall be prepared by the court and the compromise will be made part of the record. 7. The court in that scenario will allow the parties to obtain certified copy of the report as well as compromise and it will be open to the applicants to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings. 8. For a period of one month, the operation and enforcement of the impugned summoning order dated 12.06.2025 shall remain stayed. 9. Office is directed to return the original compromise deed to the learned counsel for the applicants, if any, after taking the photocopy of the same. December 18, 2025 Karan A482 No. 10649 of 2025 2 (Divesh Chandra Samant,J.) Digitally signed by :- KARAN KUMAR RAO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench