ASHOK KUMAR DIXIT v. M.D. UP STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION LUCKNOW and OTHERS
WRIA/10018/2016 · 2025-11-21
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 198670 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 198670 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 10018 of 2016 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the State is present.
4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Consigned to records. November 21, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Basant Lal, Dileep Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : Chandra Shekhar Pandey, Ravindra Pratap Singh (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Ashok Kumar Dixit .....Petitioner(s) M.D. Up State Road Transport Corporation Lucknow And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench