Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 198645 (ALL)

SADASHIV PANDEY v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. BASIC EDUCATION DEPTT. and 3 ORS.

WPIL/10536/2014 · 2025-10-17

Rajan Roy, Rajeev Bharti

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 10536 of 2014 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE RAJAN ROY, J. HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J. 1. None appears for the petitioner. 2. As per the counter affidavit dated 20.4.2017, on inquiry it was found that work of construction of the value of Rs. 69887/- had not been got done by the opposite party no. 4. i.e., the Headmaster of Primary School, Shadipur Kotwa, Block- Deeh, District- Raebareli. Accordingly, notice was issued given to him for depositing the said amount within a period of one week, failing which the said amount would be deducted from his salary. 3. Shri Nishant Shukla, learned Additional C.S.C. says that the recovery has already been effected. No rejoinder affidavit has been filed and teaching work is going on in the primary school. 4. With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of. October 17, 2025 Shravan Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Moti Lal Yadav, Abhay Singh, Rahul Singh Rana Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Bani Barua, Navendu Srivastava (Rajeev Bharti,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) Sadashiv Pandey .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Basic Education Deptt. And 3 Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SHRAVAN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench