VIKAS KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO.
BAIL/9578/2025 · 2025-10-09
Saurabh Lavania
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 198642 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 198642 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9578 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. Instant bail application has been filed by the applicant in Case Crime No.0143 of 2025, under Sections- 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 61(2) B.N.S, P.S.- Hanswar, District- Ambedkar Nagar, with the prayer to enlarge him on bail. 3. It is stated that two co-accused persons, namely, Sukhi Lal Verma and Gyanchand have already been enlarged on bail by the Coordinate Bench of this Court vide orders dated 12.09.2025 and 26.09.2025 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application Nos. 8759 of 2025 and 9401 of 2025, respectively, copy whereof has been annexed as Annexure No. 2 to the affidavit filed in support of the bail application. In these circumstances, the applicant is also entitled to be released on bail on the ground of parity. 4. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the prayer of the applicant, however, he could not dispute the above contention made by the applicant's counsel. 5. Considering the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. and going through the contents of the application, F.I.R., as well as other relevant documents and also taking note of the fact that aforesaid two co-accused persons have already been released on bail and Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Amrendra Nath Tripathi, Bajrangi Verma, Ranjeet Kumar Pal Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Vikas Kumar .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
also that the applicant has no criminal history and without going into the merits of the case, this Court is of the view that the application has substance and it is accordingly, allowed on the ground of parity. 6. Let applicant- Vikas Kumar, be released on bail in aforesaid Case Crime, on his furnishing personal bond to the satisfaction of the court concerned forthwith. Applicant is also directed to furnish two reliable sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions:- (1) Applicant will not try to influence the witnesses or tamper with the evidence of the case or otherwise misuse the liberty of bail.
(2) Applicant will fully cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when witnesses are present in the Court. (3) Applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. (4) The party shall file computer generated copy of such order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad. (5) The computer generated copy of such order shall be self attested by the counsel of the party concerned. (6) The concerned Court/Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing. 7. Any violation of above conditions will be treated misuse of bail and learned Court below will be at liberty to pass appropriate order in the matter regarding cancellation of bail. October 9, 2025 Preeti BAIL No. 9578 of 2025 2 (Saurabh Lavania,J.) Digitally signed by :- PREETI GAUTAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench