SANJAY KUMAR SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE LUCKNOW and ORS.
WPIL/24642/2019 · 2025-11-21
Rajan Roy, Rajeev Bharti
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 198628 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 198628 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 24642 of 2019 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE RAJAN ROY, J.
HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J.
1. Heard Shri Prabhakar Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State.
2. The petitioner alleges encroachment on a 'Nala' by the private opposite party no. 6.
3. Let the petitioner approach the Executive Officer, Nagar Palika Parishad, Akbarpur, District- Ambedkar Nagar who may get the facts verified and see as to whether any action is required at his level or by the Nagar Palika under the Municipalities Act, 1916 or not, If it is required, then, he shall proceed to take such action in accordance with law.
4. If the petitioner is still aggrieved he shall be at liberty to pursue other remedies if there is a cause and if he has a locus in the matter.
5. With the aforesaid observations/ directions, the writ petition is disposed of. November 21, 2025 R.K.P. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Prabhakar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Rakesh Kumar Chaudhary (Rajeev Bharti,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) Sanjay Kumar Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Lucknow And Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAJ KUMAR PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench