TATA MOTORS LTD THROUGH ITS DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER LEGAL NAMELY SHRI RAJESH KUMAR DAS v. TAPOSHI PAUL AND ORS
MA/386/2014 · 2025-06-17
Arun Kumar Rai
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 19862 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 19862 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:JHHC:15772
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
M.A. No. 386 of 2014 Tata Motors Ltd., Telco, Jamshedpur, through its Deputy General Manager (Legal), namely Shri Rajesh Kumar Das, Son of late P.N. Das, Resident of C/15, Vivekanand Road, P.O. Baridih, P.S. Sidhgora, Town-Jamshedpur, District-East Singhbhum.
… Appellant
Versus
1. Taposhi Paul, wife of Deepak Paul
2. Deepak Paul, son of late Murari Paul.
3. Miss. Deepa Paul, D/o Deepak Paul, minor daughter of Taposhi Paul and Deepak Paul and represented through Legal Guardian mother Taposhi Paul. All residents of House No. 16, Road No.7, Anand Nagar, Namda Basti, P.O.&P.S. Golmuri, Jamshedpur, District-East Singhbhum.
… Applicants/Respondents
4. The New India Insurance Company Ltd., Kamani Centre, Bistupur, P.O. & P.S. Bistupur, Town-Jamshedpur, District- East Singhbhum, Jharkhand.
… Opposite Party No.2/Respondents
----------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR RAI -------
For the Appellant : Mrs. Swati Shalini, Advocate For Respondent No.4 : Mr. G.C. Jha, Advocate
---------
Order No.18/ Dated 17th June, 2025
1. Mrs. Swati Shalini, learned Associate Counsel to Mr. Amit Kumar Das, learned counsel for the appellant submits that entire amount has already been paid and the appellant does not want to pursue the present appeal and therefore, she wants to withdraw the present appeal.
2. She further submits that the statutory amount of Rs. 25,000/- has already been deposited and same may kindly be directed to be returned to the appellant.
3. Mr. G.C. Jha, learned counsel is present on behalf of the Insurance Company and having no objection.
2025:JHHC:15772
2.
4. In view of the submission advanced on behalf of the appellant, the present Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
5. Statutory amount deposited on behalf of the appellant be refunded to the appellant.
6. Resultantly, I.A. No. 435 of 2017 also stands disposed of.
(Arun Kumar Rai, J.) R.K./Suman