Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 198607 (ALL)

VISHAL SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO.

BAIL/9659/2025 · 2025-10-09

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9659 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.851 of 2025, under Section 115(2), 351(3), 333, 64(1) of BNS, P.S. Kotwali Nagar, District Barabanki. 3. The FIR in question was lodged by the informant who is married stating that she used to live with her children as a tenant and on the date before lodging of the FIR i.e. 08.09.2025, the applicant entered and formed physical relations with her against her consent. It was also stated that substantial injuries were caused. Allegations in the statements under Section 180 & 183 BNSS were a reiteration of the allegations in the FIR. The medical of the victim done on the very next day did not corroborate any of the allegations including the alleged injury. The age of the victim is around 23 years. 4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 5. Considering the medical not corroborating any of the allegations, the applicant who is in custody since 09.09.2025 and has no criminal antecedent is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 6. Let the applicant Vishal Singh be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Umeshwar Pratap Pandey, Rajesh Shukla, Sanjay Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Vishal Singh .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 9, 2025 nishant BAIL No. 9659 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- NISHANT MOHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench